Evaluation of psychological hardiness and coping style as risk resilience factors for health risk behaviour 33 2 rtomphfm205 introduction alcohol and drug abuse among military personnel returning from overseas deployments is a growing problem, one which greatly complicates and in some cases prevents full health recovery. Article information, pdf download for testretest reliability of the. Reproductions supplied by edrs are the best that can be made. The original 45item drs scale was developed by bartone 6, and later reduced to 30. Logical relationships across form with social skills rating scale, internalizing symptoms scale for children, behavioral and emotional rating scale, student life satisfaction scale, school social behavior scales, home and community social behavior scales. This paper presents a short, 15item scale for measuring personality hardiness. A crosscultural study in italy, spain, and the united states article pdf available in european journal of psychological assessment 282. The 14item resilience scale rs14 is a short version of the resilience scale wagnild, 2011 aimed to measure overall trait resilience. The dispositional resilience scale drs15 the drs15 was developed by bartone as a means to assess relatively stable traits of dispositional resilience control, commitment and challenge.
Rossi, bisconti and bergeman 2007 cited the results of a study about dispositional resilience and described three qualities that a person may exhibit when demonstrating dispositional resilience. Commitment involvement with people, rather than isolation or alienation. The search terms used were resilience, resilience and scale, resilience and instruments. The impacts of dispositional optimism and psychological. A brief, 15item hardiness scale was developed from a longer version known as the dispositional resilience scale drs, which first. Testretest correlations provide the most appropriate estimate of reli ability when short scales are used to measure complex constructs. Scale cesd, and korean resilience questionnaire53 krq53 were. A psychometric evaluation of the lithuanian version of the. Psychometric properties of the revised norwegian dispositional resilience hardiness scale.
Testretest reliability of the dispositional resilience scale15, a. A correlational study on dispositional resilience, psychological. Validity and reliability of the connordavidson resilience. The undefined acronym abbreviationslang drs means dispositional resilience scale. High score on scale denote extremely high resilience while low score shows low level of resilience. Dec 17, 20 dispositional optimism and psychological resilience are therefore important protection factors of subjective well being. The 10item connordavidson resilience scale cdrisc has demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties as a measure of resilience in all the previous studies conducted in develope. In a baseline study conducted in june 2015, the drs15, center for epidemiologic studiesdepression scale cesd, and korean resilience questionnaire53 krq53 were administered to 409 korean adults aged 2079 years.
The drs is a selfreport instrument that measures psychological hardiness. Measures of resilience and an evaluation of the resilience. Ageadjusted cox proportional hazards models identified a doseresponse relationship such that moderately and highly hopeless men were at significantly increased risk of allcause and causespecific mortality relative to men with low hopelessness scores. Based on prior findings, this study mainly focused on the confirmation of the mediation effect of psychological resilience between dispositional optimism and subjective well being.
The drs15 tries to determine those constructs by means of 15 items five in each of them. Resilience is the phenomenon in which positive outcomes occur despite the presence of significant negative factors. Philosophers sometimes use the term dispositional to refer to beliefs that are implicit in the present sense but this invites confusion with the occurrent dispositional distinction discussed above. Norwegian adaptation of the drs dispositional resilience. They have a positive self image and display great optimism for the future. Pdf norwegian adaptation of the drsdispositional resilience. Validity and reliability of the connordavidson resilience scale cd risc in competitive sport. Reliability and validity of the korean version of the 15. The 19 items for 4 factors identified that explained 67.
Resilience, suicidal ideation, depression and adolescents. The brief resilience scale provides both unique and important information about people and how they cope with healthrelated stressors, according to the study. Pdf testretest correlations provide the most appropriate estimate of reliability when short scales are used to measure complex constructs. Thus, not all individuals with high exposure to stress and. Feb 04, 2011 the brief resilience scale states its aim is to assess resilience as an outcome. However, the criteria for the psychometric quality of the instrument were based only on classical test theory. Nov 23, 2011 second, we tested the hypothesis that mh would mediate the association of hardiness with ph. Poster po09 at wpa meeting, section on epidemiology and public health, sao paulo. Davidson resilience scale cdrisc, connordavidson resilience scale 10 cdrisc 10, resilience scale. Crosscultural adaptation of the drs15 dispositional. Compared to the existing resilience scales, the rsa covers all three of the main classes of resilience. In this paper a new scale for measuring the presence of protective resources that promote adult resilience is validated. Pdf the brief resilience scale is one of the tools offered via the positive psychology toolkit.
Testretest reliability of the dispositional resilience. Norwegian adaptation of the drs dispositional resilience scale for measuring hardiness under stress paul t. Kobasa, 1979, which is a dispositional form of resilience and characteristics derived from the presence of protective factors found in research on resilient individuals lyons, 1991. Defining clusters of the dispositional resilience scale and their relation to soldiers health. Executive function, dispositional resilience, and cognitive. The preliminary version of the scale consisted of 45 items covering five dimensions. This image reflects a dispositional diagnosis of our problems, as social psychologists would call it.
A number of 357 participants with ages between 18 and 80, selected from different social categories completed the dispositional resilience scale drs15 and the sense of coherence scale soc. Resilience scale for nurses showed cfa supported the fourfactor structure philosophical pattern, relational pattern, dispositional pattern, and situational pattern of the measure. Personality hardiness has been found to be a stresshealth moderator in a wide range of studies. We followed an international standard of crosscultural translation and validation of patientreported outcome measures to. Journal of personality and social psychology, vol 371, pp.
The aim of this study was to report translation and transcultural adaptation of the 15item dispositional resilience scale in traditional chinese cdrs15 and evaluate its psychometric properties. In postdoctoral work at chicago i further developed this into the 45item dispositional resilience scale drs, which was better balanced for positive and negative items, and for capturing the three main facets of hardiness commitment, control and challenge, with 15 items for each facet. These childreported scales included items rated on a fourpoint likerttype scale ranging from 1. Crosscultural adaptation of the drs15 dispositional resilience scale.
Bibliography for resilience scale and rs14 the resilience. When administering the scale, it is called the future scale. To the right of each you will find seven numbers, ranging from. The connordavidson resilience scale, for example, has been. Kripkes argument is best approached by first considering what is often called a dispositional theory of linguistic meaning. This short hardiness scale drs15 has the advantages of brevity, good internal consistency, and validity barone, 1995, 1999. In other words, resilient individuals are typically seen as having a positive selfimage. Development and validation of the italian version of the 15item. Testretest reliability of the dispositional resilience scale. Questionnaire srq, and other measures to 575 participants from the psychiatric.
Hardiness was first described by suzanne ouellette kobasa in the 1979 article stressful life events, personality, and health. The resilience scale metaphor final frameworks institute. The search yielded 22 publications specific to this investigation. There are several instruments that are used to study resilience in a variety of populations. The ego resilience scale please read the below statements about yourself and indicate how well it applies to you by circling the answer to the right from 1 does not apply at all to 4 applies very strongly. While most resilience assessments look into the factors which develop resilience, the brief resilience scale brs is a selfrating questionnaire aimed at measuring an individuals ability to bounce back from stress. A twoindicator latent variable for dispositional resilience was created using the egoresiliency scale er89. The emergent factor structure of these scales can provide further insight in to the composite elements of resilience.
Languagebased tests and screening tools are used extensively in psychological research and practice around the world. The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and factor structure of a revised norwegian hardiness scale dispositional resilience scale 15. Hardiness, korean version, reliability, resilience, validity. Dispositional resilience scale crosscultural adaptation phase. Control influence over outcomes, rather than powerlessness. Evaluation of psychological hardiness and coping style as.
To the right of each you will find seven numbers, ranging from 1 strongly disagree on the left to 7 strongly agree on the right. Applications and development of the socialemotional assets and resilience scales, parent version. The aim of this paper has focused on the calibration of the cdrisc with a nonclinical sample of 444 adults using the raschandrich rating scale model. The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and factor structure of a revised norwegian hardiness scale dispositional resilience. The evaluation of interventions and policies designed to promote resilience, and research to understand the determinants and associations, require reliable and valid measures to ensure data quality. Jan, 2015 psychometric analysis and refinement of the connordavidson resilience scale cdrisc. How to measure resilience with these 8 resilience scales. In the 30 years that have elapsed since it was first introduced, the concept of hardiness has continued to attract the attention and interest of researchers from all over the world. The total hope scale score is derived by summing the four agency and the four pathway items. This site provides easy access to research and supporting documents on the dispositional resilience scale drs, a valid and reliable instrument for measuring the personal resilience qualities summarized as psychological hardiness. The brief resilience scale states its aim is to assess resilience as an outcome. Testretest reliability of the dispositional resilience scale15, a brief hardiness scale article pdf available in psychological reports 10 pt 1. The resilience scale for adults rsa, the sense of coherence scale soc and the hopkins symptom checklist. Leadershiptraction hardiness, resilience and stress management.
Presented at the meeting of the american psychological association, toronto, canada. Pdf psychometric properties of the revised norwegian. The dispositional resilience scale drs measures psychological. Psychometric properties of the revised norwegian dispositional. Trait stress resistance and dynamic stress dissipation on.
Respondents report their level of agreement with each item on a 7point likerttype scale ranging from 1 strongly disagree to 7 strongly agree. Second, we tested the hypothesis that mh would mediate the association of hardiness with ph. Norwegian adaptation of the drsdispositional resilience scale for. The short version consists of 14 items rated on a 7point likert scale with two anchoring statements from strongly disagree 1 to strongly agree 7. To find out how hardy and resilient you and your direct reports really are, leadershiptraction offers the dispositional resilience scale drs15, a 15question selfassessment created, tested, and validated by hardiness resilience researcher, author, and maddi and kobasa protege, paul t. Sep 23, 2015 the connordavidson resilience scale cdrisc is inarguably one of the bestknown instruments in the field of resilience assessment. The brief resilient coping scale brcs the brief resilient coping scale brcs is an even shorter measure of resilient coping, designed by sinclair and walston 2004, to capture individuals ability to cope with stress in highly adaptive ways. The resilience scale rs 2 march 3911 please read the following statements. Even so, items in the brief resilience scale, although corresponding with the ability to recover and cope with difficulties, all reflect a sense of personal agency, e. The compassion subscale of the dpes is a 5item questionnaire that measures a dispositional tendency to feel compassion toward people in general.
Reliability and validity of the korean version of the 15item. Introduction our interest in resilience arose from long experience treating men and women with posttraumatic stress disorder ptsd, as well as from our broadrange research into the disorder, which covered treatment assessment, diagnosis, biological characterization, crosscultural study, epidemiology, risk factors and the development of measures for ptsd and other forms of anxiety. The agency subscale score is derived by summing items 2, 9, 10, and 12. Measures of resilience and an evaluation of the resilience scale rs.
The current drs15r is the result of 30 years of research and scale development work. What is the abbreviation for resilience scale for adults. Brief resilience scale brs please respond to each item by marking. This short hardiness scale dbs15 has the advantages of brevity, good internal consistency, and validity barone, 1995, 1999. Factor structure and psychometric properties of the dispositional. A brief, 15item hardiness scale was developed from a longer. The resilience scale is effective at channeling thinking away from the following.
Validation studies included the concurrent application of the drs15. Psychometric evaluation of the dutch resilience scale rsnl on 3265 healthy participants. Identical measures were collected in two separate, demographicallysimilar samples n 65 and n 55. Factor structure and psychometric properties of the. Affordable and search from millions of royalty free images, photos and vectors. Testretest reliability of the dispositional resilience scale 15, a brief hardiness scale article pdf available in psychological reports 10 pt 1. In order for tests to work effectively in different. Moderating effects of dispositional resilience on associations between hassles and psychological distress. This study concerned the relationships among the dispositional resilience, the dimensions of psychological wellbeing, and the coping strategies in a sample of 183 italian university students aged 2026 years and recruited from three degree courses at university of catania east sicily, italy. Target population mode of completion number dimensions items purpose of the measure 1a the dispositional resilience scale 1 bartone 1989 adults self report 3 45 designed to measure psychological hardiness commitment, control, and challenge. For the rsa, two separate analyses report that one of the six subscales to be dispositional resilience scale, the challenge subscale alpha 0.
The search was further refined to resilience scale and psychometric properties. Connordavidson resilience scale 10item rehabmeasures database. Drs dispositional resilience scale in undefined by. Pdf testretest reliability of the dispositional resilience scale15, a. Demographic and childhood environmental predictors of resilience in a community sample. An indepth psychometric analysis of the connordavidson. Our problem is the weak lacking in will disposition of people. Kripkes argument is best approached by first considering what is often called a dispositional theory of linguistic meaning physicalism. A brief, 15item hardiness scale was developed from a longer version known as the dispositional resilience scale drs, which first appeared in 1989.
Rsa abbreviation stands for resilience scale for adults. Crosscultural adaptation and validation of brazilian portuguese versions of the dispositional resilience scale and connordavidson resilience scale. Let me know how true the following characteristics are as they apply to you generally. For example, the dispositional resilience scale, a modification of kosabas 1979 scale, was used with survivor assistance officers bartone, et al.
314 131 104 856 542 763 1391 355 793 1221 1183 1127 1124 119 716 68 1163 632 187 814 1527 733 556 191 1467 722 195 426 1470 1257 474 920 1238